A short while ago, The Wichita Eagle ran a column
of mine on the brouhaha
over whether the Wichita City Council ought to continue with the current limit
of two terms for city council members, or if it ought to be expanded to three. Since talking about government is what I do for a living–and since this
argument is likely to come back sometime
in the new year –let me expand on this a little. To reiterate, Wichita has a council-manager
form of government. That means that the city is divided into districts (in our
case six, meaning each council member theoretically represents the concerns and
interests of roughly 65,000 people per district), and the mayor is simply an
at-large member of the city council, with some particular procedural
responsibilities (supposedly enough to make it a full-time position, whereas
every other member of the council is nominally a part-time employee of the
city), but fundamentally no different from anyone else elected to the council
to a four-year term. Practical executive power–that is, the authority to keep
the city running on a day-to-day basis–is not vested in the mayor or the
council, but rather in a city manager, who is hired (at $228K a year, more than
twice what the mayor is paid) by the city council, and theoretically subject to
their oversight.